Whoa!
|
OK, so you've decided to email me. I used to have a nice conventional mailto: link
on about a dozen pages that people could just click on. I pulled it for several reasons:
- It was too easy for spambots* to find and harvest. Some days I get 6 or more spam messages and I'm
convinced many of them are because I've had my email address here.
- I don't have as much time to put into this as I used to.
- First of all, this is a page devoted to screw-mount Yashica SLRs from the 1960s and 70s. I don't know
much of anything about:
- Rangefinders (try here)
- Newer SLRs like the FX-3 and afterward
- Movie cameras
- Other brands
- I can at least empathize with owners of TLRs since I now own a Yashicamat 124G, but I'm by no means an
authority on them.
- I started this site as a project for an HTML class I was taking back in 1998. The course is over, I got an A,
but now I've got other things to do. I used to have a job that was boring and didn't pay very well but gave me free internet access,
and time to answer emails and tinker with the site. I still have free internet access (I'm now a network
administrator) but I have no time at work to deal with this site. I've spent many evenings at home answering
emails and looking things up for people. I still enjoy that sometimes, but I am trying to get other things
done as well.
- I've kept this site up as a hobby. I consider it a resource and so, apparently, do 200 or 300 other people per week. It's not a business of any sort. I'm not losing any money by ignoring your email, because I'm not making any to
begin with.
|
Still reading, huh? OK. Please bear a few things in mind:
- I don't like rangefinders
- It's never made sense to me to be looking through a different lens than the one you're taking pictures through. It causes parallax in macro work, and it means that if you want to use a lens other than normal you'd better be bloody well sure that
you've got one for the viewfinder that shows you the same thing the film sees.
- With an SLR it's fairly easy to adapt a monocular or telescope or microscope to it. Not a rangefinder.
- I've never owned a rangefinder other than for a few weeks after a friend gave me a couple, before I gave them back to him without ever putting film in one.
- So if you've got an Electro 35 or one of its variants (there were over 20 rangefinder models) I probably
don't know much about it. If you're not sure whether it's a rangefinder or not, if it has a window in the front of
any sort other than the main lens, it's a rangefinder. Still in doubt? Look on my rangefinder history page.
- Yes, I know, they're cheap, they're common, they're lighter weight than an SLR, and they're quieter. I don't care.
- There is a similar site for rangefinder fans. Try the Yashica Guy
- About 40% of the mail I get is questions about rangefinders
- About 30% of the mail I get is about batteries (including for rangefinders). There are three basic questions:
- What kind of battery does my camera take?
- (The obvious) Look at the old battery if you've got one. You can do some cross-referencing of numbers by looking at my battery dimensions page. There's more cross-referencing information in places like the Radio Sh
ack catalog. Even if you can't find a readable number on it, try measuring its physical size, then looking at the dimensions page. Battery manufacturers did a pretty good job of sizing batteries so that if a battery fits the hole and makes contact, it's
probably the right one.
- Please take a look at Yashica's battery chart first. Admittedly they've dropped some of the older models off of it, but it's worth a look. There's no better authority.
- I have batteries for most of the screw-mount SLRs listed here
- If you don't have the old battery, try measuring the hole it fits into, then see my dimensions page.
- Is the original battery for my camera still being made?
- Probably not! (but...)
- In the era during which most of these cameras were made, the best batteries for the job were mercury batteries. They have a nearly constant voltage throughout most of their useful life, with a sudden dropoff at the end. Manufacturing them has
also been banned in most countries for environmental reasons.
- Common alternatives are alkaline and silver oxide. These work well enough, and fit with no modifications to the camera. Choose the silver oxide over the alkaline if you have a choice.
- With the different materials come suffix letters on the battery numbers. A PX-32 (mercury) for instance, would be replaced by a PX-32A (alkaline) or a PX-32B.
- Where can I buy one?
- Try local places first. With shipping costs being what they are, the shipping may well cost more than the battery itself.
- Try your local Radio Shack
- Try your local camera store (or maybe old-fashioned drug store)
- There are a couple of reasonable mail-order places. There's Wholesale Advantage and photobattery.com. Photobattery.com at least
advertises that they'll try to
find out what battery your camera needs if you send them the camera's model number.
- About 20% of the mail I get is about manuals.
- No, I don't have any for sale
- No, I don't have any in electronic form that I can post or email (so far)
- Here again, your best bet is to go to the source. Yashica has manuals and reprints for sale at around $7 for most models.
- As an alternative, Craig Camera has quite a stock of them, but he gets $15-18 for them.
- 90% of the time I answer questions with no more information than I already have here on my site anyway. That's why it's here.
|
OK, so you still want to email me? OK, here's how, but remember:
- I may not answer if I don't actually have a good answer. Try posting your question to one of the rec.photo.* newsgroups
- I do answer general questions about photography, but I probably won't answer questions specific to rangefinders.
- All right, here it is. You figure out where to put the @ sign (maybe the robots won't): coreya at valinet.com
- Please put the word Yashica in the subject line somewhere, so it stands out among the spam.
|
* If you haven't run across the term spambot before, it's a search engine designed to
comb web sites looking for email addresses. These addresses are then sold to people who send nasty, unsolicited email
selling things no one in their right mind would buy. (If they're so unscrupulous as to send you junk email, are
you really stupid enough to trust them enough to buy something from them?) Most people get to this site through
search engines. I've never gone out of my way to list it with search engines, they've just found it. Spambots
also find my email address here the same way. I finally set up a bunch of fake addresses in an
addressbook to keep them busy. See the explanation
linked to that page.
I don't read my email anymore unless it comes from one of a few people or has the word Yashica in the subject. The spam
rate has gotten to over 330 a day, and out-numbers any mail I actually care about more than 100:1. So as of
December 5, 2003 I open up my email about once a day, search for a few strings in the Subject and From fields, and dump
all the rest. About once a week if I have time I sit down and spend an hour or two using whois, traceroute, and nslookup
to investigate a few of the spammers and complain to the internet providers that seem to host them. It's a losing battle,
and the spam usually comes in faster than I can look it up and complain. I can empty my inbox, wait for the first one to
come in, start researching it, and by the time I'm done there are 2 or 3 more. Sometimes I get 10 or 20 behind and then
sort of catch up, but I never actually get my inbox empty again. There is a certain satisfaction in trying
to be a thorn in their sides though. I wish they'd just go out and get real jobs.
SpamCop isn't bad, and it's essentially non-profit so you can use it for free. It's a relatively easy way to report spam
to the administrators of the networks where it originates. They also have filtered email accounts and filtering services
(for a fee). Those are probably most useful if you get hundreds of spam emails a day like I do. The reporting, even when
you make a donation, still requires several clicks and waiting for a couple of web pages to load to deal with each
individual piece of spam. Much too slow - it would take me an hour or so of clicking per day to report everything. Once
a day or so I report about the last 40 that came in and dump the rest. I've taken up tinkering with Perl again and I've
got an alternative brewing.
That worked, but I'm dumping Valinet as an ISP. You can reach me at alancorey at yahoo.