========= THE MOTLEY FOOL ========================

                      INVESTING STRATEGIES

                         Tuesday, April 6, 2004

SURVIVING THE FUND SCANDAL

By Shannon Zimmerman

For a nation invested in mutual funds, these are the proverbial

best and worst of times. Last year, the typical stock fund

racked up an impressive gain for the first time since the

market sold off in earnest in March 2000. On the other hand --

and that would be the one that slaps you silly -- the

industry's soft underbelly got positively gigged when New York

Attorney General Eliot Spitzer uncorked the sorry successor to

2002's Wall Street scandals.

A YEAR IN REVIEW

According to Spitzer's office, fund shops operated by the likes

of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Bank One (NYSE: ONE), and Janus

Capital Group (NYSE: JNS) permitted certain big-shot investors

to trade rapidly into and out of their funds, essentially

funneling gains from long-term investors to traders. Worse,

Spitzer alleged that Bank of America's Nations Funds unit

actually facilitated trades after the market close.

Already, more than a dozen other fund shops have been implicated,

including Alliance Capital (NYSE: AC), Federated Investors (NYSE:

FII), FleetBoston Financial (NYSE: FBF), and Marsh & McLennan

Companies' (NYSE: MMC) Putnam unit. Almost overnight, the mutual

fund industry's squeaky-clean image was left in tatters. In its

place, we have an image of craven corporate bean counters in

pursuit of quick and ill-gotten profits.

Sorry for the overheated language, but it sure beats we told you

so. For years, The Motley Fool has advised against owning mutual

funds, and now, more than ever, we see why. Our advice has long

been that folks willing to do their homework are better off

investing either in individual stocks or in low-cost

index-trackers such as Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VFINX).

SING A NEW SONG

Still, it always nagged me that maybe we were painting the

entire industry with too broad a brush, and that maybe -- given

that so many people are invested in funds -- we might direct

our attention to identifying the best among an admittedly

middling lot. We launched Motley Fool Champion Funds with just

that in mind -- and with the goal of helping investors steer

clear of the junk and home in on those with a history of doing

the right things and beating the S&P 500 in the process.

http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=1154379&u=129995836

But while that's all well and good for the future, what, pray

tell, should savvy fund investors do now? Good question.

First, if you hold funds from families that have been

implicated in the scandal, don't assume you should sell your

shares posthaste. Among other considerations, any decision to

unload a fund must be made in light of the tax hit you're

likely to take. Righteous indignation notwithstanding, there's

no reason to add insult to injury by selling a fund from a shop

that has violated your trust and then sending a check to Uncle

Sam for the privilege.

Remember: Despite the damage to the reputations of the

implicated shops, the funds themselves aren't going to hit the

skids as a result of the scandal. Regardless of the revelations,

their Net Asset Values (NAVs) are still going to be determined

by the value of the stocks held in their portfolios.

THE GOOD NEWS?

So sit back, relax, and enjoy one of the advantages of being a

fund investor. Unlike shareholders in scandal-ridden

corporations like Enron (OTC: ENRNQ) and WorldCom, you aren't

going to lose your shirt thanks to the antics of a few jokers

who were more interested in lining their own pockets than doing

right by their shareholders. Mutual funds don't work that way,

which is one of the main reasons so many people invest in them.

In fact, I'm encouraged by the way the scandal has played out so

far. The settlement terms that some of the implicated shops have

agreed to are huge, and I absolutely love the fact that Spitzer

has been negotiating fee-reduction programs with some shops

along the way.

And after years of behaving like toothless watchdogs, federal

regulators are finally getting in on the action, helping to push

the industry toward some serious (and long overdue) reforms.

Mandatory redemption fees (which would defeat the purpose of

rapid trading) are on the table. The infamous 12b-1 fee (a

marketing surcharge that many funds bake into their expenses) is

coming under scrutiny, too. And beginning later this year, funds

companies must disclose in dollars and cents the costs

associated with a $1,000 investment in every fund they offer.

STOP THAT CHECK!

All of that said, not selling a fund from a scandal-tainted shop

is one thing. Sending even one more dollar to that firm is quite

another. Until the culprits have proved over time that they've

cleaned house and changed their ways, there's absolutely no

reason to send them another dime. Plenty of shops haven't been

accused of wrong doing, so plan to do your next round of mutual

fund shopping there.

What's more, even if you don't hold funds from any of the firms

implicated thus far, you should still plan to stay vigilant.

Spitzer's probe is ongoing. And beyond putting you on the look

out for criminal or unethical behavior, the scandal should be

your cue to take a cold, hard look at each fund you own and ask

the following questions:

- Is it pricey? (The typical actively managed stock fund's

  expense ratio will ding you about 1.5%.)

- Does the manager churn through stocks like your kid goes

  through Xbox games?

- How long has that guy been at the controls anyway?

- Does he put his money where his mouth is by investing his own

  moolah in the fund? (If not, why should you?)

- What's the fund's performance been like over the long haul?

  Would you have done just as well (if not better) in a low-cost

  S&P tracker?

That's not an exhaustive list, but it's a very solid start. And

surprise, surprise: We ask each and every one of these questions

as we go about the business of picking funds that make the grade

in our Champion Funds newsletter.

http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=1154380&u=129995836

Quite the coincidence, huh?

Shannon Zimmerman is a Fool for funds and editor of Motley Fool

Champion Funds, but he doesn't own shares of Vanguard 500 Index.

You can ask him why via email. The Motley Fool is investors

writing for investors.

_______________________________________________________________

                 This is a promotional email from

                         The Motley Fool

               123 N. Pitt St - Alexandria, VA 22314

  Copyright (c) 1995-2004 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved.

 Legal Information: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=1154388&u=129995836