| Legal 450 Spring 2007 |
Legal Research and Writing | Department of Legal Studies University of Massachusetts Amherst |
| | Home | Requirements | Schedule | Writing Assignments | Cases and Statutes |Grammar and Punctuation| |
|
|
Rule 5. More commas: parenthetical phrases When you have a group of words that describe a noun whose meaning is already clearly defined, you set off the group of words with commas. The phrase is similar to a parenthetical expression that contains nonessential information. If you remove the phrase from the sentence, the meaning does not change drastically. Some meaning may be lost, but the essential characteristics remain. For basketball camp, the children needed high quality sneakers, which were expensive. In this example, the essential information is that the children needed good sneakers in order to go to basketball camp; the fact that the sneakers were expensive is more of an afterthought and thus it is set off with a comma. The dessert made with fresh raspberries was delicious. The dessert, made with fresh raspberries, was delicious. The first example has no commas because the phrase “made with fresh raspberries” is essential information which tells the reader which of several desserts the writer is referring to. The second example has commas because the phrase “made with fresh raspberries” adds nonessential information about the dessert. The rule of thumb here is that if you can remove the phrase from the sentence without losing any essential meaning, then it should be set off with commas. Practice:
Click here for suggested answers
|
|
| |
| Home | Requirements | Schedule | Writing Assignments | Cases and Statutes | Grammar amd Punctuation | © 2006, Judith L. Holmes. This is the course Web site for Legal 450, Department of Legal Studies. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Produced and maintained by Judith L. Holmes, jholmes@legal.umass.edu |